CBDC’s Tyranny Is Coming


How & Why You should Prepare


Or Not !!!
For the Future Generations sake…

Here are just a few examples of what that sort of total control may look like:


Government in total control

The government could not only withhold money whenever they deemed fit but they could also devalue the currency.


Lack of privacy

The government will be aware of all of your financial information, what you owe and to whom, what you are spending money on, and what assets you have.


The end of personal security

No longer can you โ€œhideโ€ savings under your mattress. The government will always know how much you have and will have access to it.


Tracking of purchases

The government will be able to track everything you purchaseโ€”and potentially stop you from buying it. Letโ€™s say it is something the political party in charge disagrees with, such as legalized marijuana. They can track you and prevent you from purchasing it again.


Tracking pornography purchases, abortion payments, tax evasion, and more…

While you may not think this is a bad idea, what if it goes a step further? What if they think you need to eat less red meat?


Hacking and data breaches

My head spins just thinking of all the ways a CBDC could be attacked by hackers or cyber terrorists.


Educate Yourselves folks :

https://news.bitcoin.com/why-the-rise-of-the-cbdc-is-bad-for-your-privacy

https://edwardsnowden.substack.com/p/cbdcs

https://www.themainewire.com/2022/11/cbdc-bitcoin

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/2022/11/06/a-central-bank-cryptocurrency-the-us-should-reject-it

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/bitcoin-policy-institute-calls-on-u.s.-to-reject-its-central-bank-digital-currency

https://fee.org/articles/why-a-digital-dollar-is-a-really-bad-idea

https://theconversation.com/central-bank-digital-currencies-could-mean-the-end-of-democracy-187505

https://www.adamseconomics.com/post/the-potential-orwellian-horror-of-central-bank-digital-currencies

https://www.coindesk.com/layer2/2022/10/14/against-cbdcs-and-the-politicization-of-money

https://mises.org/wire/digital-currency-fed-moves-toward-monetary-totalitarianism

https://www.cato.org/blog/update-two-thirds-commenters-concerned-about-cbdc

https://www.coincenter.org/without-privacy-do-we-really-want-a-digital-dollar

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/digital-dollar-threat-civil-liberties

https://www.newsweek.com/cbdcs-will-end-american-freedom-opinion-1673676

https://beincrypto.com/problem-cbdcs-surrendering-total-surveillance-control

https://www.cato.org/working-paper/central-bank-digital-currency-assessing-risks-dispelling-myths

https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/central-bank-digital-currency

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/2022/11/06/a-central-bank-cryptocurrency-the-us-should-reject-it

https://www.theepochtimes.com/central-bank-digital-currency-tyranny-is-coming-how-to-prepare_5054210.html

https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-senator-ted-cruz-tries-again-with-new-bill-to-block-cbdc

https://tokenhell.com/congressmen-voice-concerns-over-the-features-of-the-us-cbdc

https://www.forbes.com/sites/norbertmichel/2022/04/12/central-bank-digital-currencies-are-about-control–they-should-be-stopped

https://www.forbes.com/sites/norbertmichel/2022/12/15/the-federal-reserve-should-drop-fednow-and-any-plans-to-launch-a-cbdc

https://pomp.substack.com/p/central-bank-digital-currencies-will

https://hackernoon.com/cbdcs-the-folly-of-digital-fiat

https://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/why-the-u-s-should-reject-central-bank-digital-currencies


Cbdc Initiatives




100 Based things



Here is a list of 100 of the best based things:

  • Writing clever, articulate and edgy raps โ€“ Based
  • Eating food with no care for nutrition โ€“ based
  • Making jokes at the expense of politcally correct people โ€“ based
  • Creating witty and inspired retorts โ€“ based
  • Refusing to conform to society’s expectations โ€“ based
  • Developing viral content โ€“ based
  • Dreaming without the boundaries of reality โ€“ based
  • Taking no sh*t from anyone โ€“ based
  • Standing up for what is right โ€“ based
  • Throwing away societyโ€™s conventions โ€“ based
  • Experimenting with new ideas โ€“ based
  • Making creative use of your skills โ€“ based
  • Celebrating all forms of success โ€“ based
  • Questioning the world around you โ€“ based
  • Expressing yourself through Art โ€“ based
  • Learning from your mistakes โ€“ based
  • Breaking the mold โ€“ based
  • Making bold statements โ€“ based
  • Improvising on the fly โ€“ based
  • Challenging the status quo โ€“ based
  • Working hard without complaining โ€“ based
  • Respecting othersโ€™ opinions โ€“ based
  • Venturing beyond your comfort zone โ€“ based
  • Befriending other outliers โ€“ based
  • Taking risks, but staying safe โ€“ based
  • Developing mental strength โ€“ based
  • Acknowledging the beauty of the world โ€“ based
  • Choosing courage over fear โ€“ based
  • Embracing your uniqueness โ€“ based
  • Worrying less, but achieving more โ€“ based
  • Being a loyal friend โ€“ based
  • Working to help others โ€“ based
  • Succeeding in your own way โ€“ based
  • Standing up for the weak โ€“ based
  • Being honest about your failures โ€“ based
  • Tackling the world with passion โ€“ based
  • Leading without authority โ€“ based
  • Accepting your flaws โ€“ based
  • Owning up to them โ€“ based
  • Motivating yourself to go further โ€“ based
  • Making informed decisions โ€“ based
  • Listening to and understanding others โ€“based
  • Analyzing problems and finding solutions โ€“ based
  • Seeing the world differently โ€“ based
  • Working against money-grubbing corporations โ€“ based
  • Refusing to be controlled by social media โ€“ based
  • Taking responsibility for your actions โ€“ based
  • Rejecting the influence of peer pressure โ€“ based
  • Showing gratitude for what you have โ€“ based
  • Developing a thick skin โ€“ based
  • Not taking no for an answer โ€“ based
  • Embracing the joy of risk-taking โ€“ based
  • Winning without gloating โ€“ based
  • Taking time for yourself โ€“ based
  • Diversifying your investments โ€“ based
  • Helping others around you succeed โ€“ based
  • Avoiding useless debates โ€“ based
  • Refusing to give into oppression โ€“ based
  • Going against the grain โ€“ based
  • Moving through life with grace โ€“ based
  • Not caring about popular opinion โ€“ based
  • Not caving into herd mentality โ€“ based
  • Outwitting conventional wisdom โ€“ based
  • Standing your ground against bullies โ€“ based
  • Reclaiming lost ground โ€“ based
  • Detaching yourself from material possessions โ€“ based
  • Questioning authority โ€“ based
  • Resisting unjust power โ€“ based
  • Ignoring criticism โ€“ based
  • Seeing through deception โ€“ based
  • Overcoming adversity โ€“ based
  • Pursuing excellence โ€“ based
  • Living life without regrets โ€“ based
  • Becoming Unbreakable โ€“ based
  • Following your gut feeling โ€“ based
  • Slaying the dragon of Conformity โ€“ based
  • Crushing comfort zones โ€“ based
  • Exploring the unknown โ€“ based
  • Keeping a cool head in a crisis โ€“ based
  • Analyzing data intelligently โ€“ based
  • Not wasting time with gossip โ€“ based
  • Adopting a Zero-Tolerance policy โ€“ based
  • Connecting with likeminded people โ€“ based
  • Committing thought crimes โ€“ based
  • Spreading your message โ€“ based
  • Asserting your autonomy โ€“ based
  • Resolving conflicts quickly โ€“ based
  • Not conforming to gender roles โ€“ based
  • Refusing to settle for mediocrity โ€“ based
  • Not taking life too seriously โ€“ based
  • Living life to the fullest โ€“ based
  • Rewriting stories with your own pen โ€“ based
  • Expressing yourself without limits โ€“ based
  • Being You – based

Trust is not based, and relying on trust is unbased. It is foolish to ever trust someone, because the only way to truly ensure that what someone is saying is true is to verify it yourself.

Relying on trust to make important decisions is the same as not making decisions at all, which would be why wise people have always told each other to never trust anyone, ever.

Instead, one should always verify all information, or else make use of carefully-chosen massive liabilities and hedges, so as to eliminate the need to trust.


Btw, did I mentioned the list was made by a Non-Human, Red-Pilled Entity ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜‹๐Ÿคฃ

I would love to hear thoughts, opinions and critics about this, from you all dear readers.





Running bitcoin – Hal Finney


Wonder In Peace Bright Mind

Join Honorary Chair Fran Finney and the Running Bitcoin Challenge Committee as we honor legendary cypher punk, Hal Finney.

This is THE EVENT that combines Hal Finney’s love of running and Bitcoin and is raising funds and awareness to help defeat ALS, which ultimately claimed his life in 2014.

You are challenged to run (or walk, roll, or hike) the equivalent of a half marathon — cumulatively or all at once — by the end of January 10, 2023.

From wherever you are, spread the word about Bitcoin, participate in a healthy activity, feel good about doing your part to defeat ALS, and start the year off right


Hal Finney, one of the earliest bitcoin contributors, died eight years ago from complications of nervous system disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

His spouse, Fran Finney, is now organizing a half marathon to raise funds for ALS research via bitcoin.



The โ€œRunning Bitcoin Challengeโ€ is set to take place between Jan. 1 and Jan. 10. The timing of the occasion leads up to the anniversary of Hal Finneyโ€™s โ€œRunning bitcoinโ€ tweet, in which Finney famously disclosed he was deploying a Bitcoin node.

There is no set location โ€” participants can choose to join anywhere they wish. Players are encouraged to either run, walk, roll or hike the equivalent of a half marathon (Halโ€™s favorite distance) either in one go or over the entire 10-day period.

Donors contributing at least $100 will receive an official shirt with the half marathonโ€™s logo, while the eventโ€™s top 25 fundraisers will get a Hal Finney collectible signed by his wife.

As of Wednesday morning, the event has already managed to secure nearly $10,000 in bitcoin donations.

An advocate of cryptography and digital privacy, Finney was the recipient of the first-ever bitcoin transfer from the networkโ€™s pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto.

The bitcoin community often suspected Finney was Nakamoto, a claim he consistently denied. He reportedly found out about his condition in 2009 and decided to move away from the project.

Halโ€™s name is high in the Bitcoin pantheon as one of the first people to voice support for Satoshi Nakamotoโ€™s invention and for being the first person to receive a Bitcoin transaction from Satoshi.

He was, for a time, considered one of the top contenders on the list of potential Satoshis himself (many in blockchain who reject Dr. Craig Wrightโ€™s statements still falsely believe Finney to be Bitcoinโ€™s real creator).

Hal, who referred to himself as a โ€œcypherpunk,โ€ was a cryptographic activist who went from developing video games to working on the Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) project in the 1990s. He described his PGP work as โ€œdedicated to the goal of making Big Brother obsolete.โ€

PGP creator Phil Zimmerman hired Hal as his first employee when PGP became PGP Corporation in the early 2000s. He described Hal as a โ€œgregarious manโ€ who loved skiing and long-distance running.

Despite gradual paralysis that eventually forced him to stop working, Hal continued to code software and follow the Bitcoin project.

Almost as famous as his 2009 tweet is his โ€œBitcoin and meโ€ post on BitcoinTalk.org in March 2013, the last heโ€™d ever make.

Itโ€™s a long post, and Hal was โ€œessentially paralyzedโ€ at the time, using an eye tracker to type. Forum stats show the post has been read over 278,000 times.

โ€œWhen Satoshi announced the first release of the software, I grabbed it right away,โ€ he wrote. โ€œI think I was the first person besides Satoshi to run bitcoin. I mined block 70-something, and I was the recipient of the first bitcoin transaction when Satoshi sent ten coins to me as a test.

I carried on an email conversation with Satoshi over the next few days, mostly me reporting bugs and him fixing them.โ€

Hal himself always denied being Satoshi Nakamoto, adding later that heโ€™d sold most of the Bitcoins he mined (at pre-2014 prices) to pay for his treatments. He also mentioned putting some in a safe deposit box for his children.

โ€œAnd, of course, the price gyrations of bitcoins are entertaining to me.

I have skin in the game.

But I came by my bitcoins through luck, with little credit to me.

I lived through the crash of 2011.

So Iโ€™ve seen it before.

Easy come, easy go.โ€

Hal Finney

www.runningbitcoin.us

Admiration and great Respect


With ๐Ÿงก

Bitcoin WhitePaper Day

Bitcoin – A Peer-to-Peer
Electronic Cash System

Itโ€™s bitcoin White Paper Day.

The mailing list was hosted by Metzdow and run by a group of cypherpunks who shared ideas on creating a kind of digital currency and payment system. Satoshi shared the whitepaper in a message that read, โ€œBitcoin P2P e-cash paper,โ€ which outlined the main properties of the system.


“Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
Satoshi Nakamoto satoshi at vistomail.com
Fri Oct 31 14:10:00 EDT 2008
Previous message: Fw: SHA-3 lounge
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I’ve been working on a new electronic cash system that’s fully
peer-to-peer, with no trusted third party.

The paper is available at:
http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

The main properties:
Double-spending is prevented with a peer-to-peer network.
No mint or other trusted parties.
Participants can be anonymous.
New coins are made from Hashcash style proof-of-work.
The proof-of-work for new coin generation also powers the
network to prevent double-spending.

Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System

Abstract. A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would
allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another
without the burdens of going through a financial institution.
Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main
benefits are lost if a trusted party is still required to prevent
double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending
problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps
transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based
proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without
redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as
proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came
from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as honest nodes control
the most CPU power on the network, they can generate the longest
chain and outpace any attackers. The network itself requires
minimal structure. Messages are broadcasted on a best effort basis,
and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the
longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they
were gone.

Full paper at:
http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Satoshi Nakamoto

———————————————————————
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending “unsubscribe cryptography” to majordomo at metzdowd.com”


Source:
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-October/014810.html


The pseudonymous Bitcoin creator disclosed that they had been working on a new electronic cash system that uses a Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus algorithm that required no trusted third party. Although the document met mixed reactions, it was the beginning of what is known today as blockchain technology.

A couple of months after the release, the Bitcoin network was launched, with the first block mined on January 3, 2009. About eight days later, Hal Finney received the first transaction of 10 BTC from Nakamoto, after which he posted a legendary tweet that read:

In the 14 years since that day, bitcoinโ€™s value rose from zero to a peak of $68,990 last November and was hovering above $20,000 on Monday, according to CoinDesk data. The cryptocurrency currently has a market capitalization of over $390 billion. It also inspired the creation of more than 20,000 different cryptocurrencies currently in circulation, while bitcoin remains the largest by market cap.

Over the years, several people have been rumored to be Nakamoto, including early bitcoin contributor Hal Finney, cryptographer Nick Szabo, physicist Dorian Nakamoto and even Teslaโ€™s chief executive Elon Musk, who all denied the claims.

Satoshiโ€™s identity is still a mystery, but Finney was well-known for his contribution to the creation of Bitcoin. He worked hand-in-hand with Nakamoto to find and fix bugs in Bitcoinโ€™s underlying infrastructure. Before his death in 2014, Finney shared a detailed story about his journey with Bitcoin

About a year after the launch of Bitcoin, the cryptocurrency went on to record its first real-world commercial use case when a Florida man spent 10,000 BTC to purchase two large Papa Johnโ€™s pizzas on May 22, 2010.

Although the coins were worth $41 at prices back then, at todayโ€™s price, the transaction is worth more than $200 million. To commemorate the event, the Bitcoin community celebrates Bitcoin Pizza Day every year on May 22.


Bitcoin / bitcoin / blockchain




Controlled Supply

Bitcoin

“A fixed money supply, or a supply altered only in accord with objective and calculable criteria, is a necessary condition to a meaningful just price of money.”

Fr. Bernard W. Dempsey, S.J. (1903-1960)

In a centralized economy, currency is issued by a central bank at a rate that is supposed to match the growth of the amount of goods that are exchanged so that these goods can be traded with stable prices. The monetary base is controlled by a central bank. In the United States, the Fed increases the monetary base by issuing currency, increasing the amount banks have on reserve or by a process called Quantitative Easing.

In a fully decentralized monetary system, there is no central authority that regulates the monetary base. Instead, currency is created by the nodes of a peer-to-peer network.

The Bitcoin generation algorithm defines, in advance, how currency will be created and at what rate. Any currency that is generated by a malicious user that does not follow the rules will be rejected by the network and thus is worthless.


Currency with Finite Supply


Block reward halving
Controlled supply

Bitcoins are created each time a user discovers a new block. The rate of block creation is adjusted every 2016 blocks to aim for a constant two week adjustment period (equivalent to 6 per hour.)

The number of bitcoins generated per block is set to decrease geometrically, with a 50% reduction every 210,000 blocks, or approximately four years. The result is that the number of bitcoins in existence will not exceed slightly less than 21 million.

Speculated justifications for the unintuitive value “21 million” are that it matches a 4-year reward halving schedule; or the ultimate total number of Satoshis that will be mined is close to the maximum capacity of a 64-bit floating point number. Satoshi has never really justified or explained many of these constants.

Cumulated bitcoin supply

This decreasing-supply algorithm was chosen because it approximates the rate at which commodities like gold are mined. Users who use their computers to perform calculations to try and discover a block are thus called Miners.





21M or Death


21 Million or Death
Arise…

The supply of Bitcoin is fixed at 21 million BTC, and as a hard coded monetary policy of the protocol, the fixed supply of the dominant cryptocurrency cannot be altered.

Former Google Product Director Steve Lee stated that only 1 percent of the worldโ€™s population can own more than 0.28 BTC, due to the fixed supply of Bitcoin.

In late 2017, Chainalysis, a blockchain forensics company that monitors and investigates cryptocurrency transactions, revealed in a research paper that up to four million BTC are permanently lost on the blockchain as a result of theft, loss of wallets and private keys, and the dormant wallet of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, which experts have said is no longer accessible.

Kim Grauer, Senior Economist at Chainalysis, said at the time, that the lost supply of BTC is not taken into consideration by the market cap.That means, the real price of BTC could be substantially higher, as 4 to 6 million BTC are estimated to be lost.

Based on the estimate that the supply of Bitcoin is around 17 million, only 0.8 percent of the world population can own more than 0.28 BTC and less than 0.2 of the world population can own more than 1 BTC.

The 0.28 BTC figure introduced by Lee assumes the supply of Bitcoin to be 21 million, as it divides 21 million by 0.28 and divides the outcome of that by the world population that is 7.442 billion. If the research of Chainalysis is accurate and that 4 to 6 million BTC are lost on the blockchain, the supply of Bitcoin should be closer to around 16 to 17 million

The fact that any investor in the global market can be within the 1 percent of the world population with a $1,830 investment demonstrates that the cryptocurrency market is still at its early phase, and in terms of adoption, market development, infrastructure, and regulation, the sector can still grow significantly in the mid to long-term.


Hal Finney

There is no “Whole Coin”





Once you’ve seen…






Need help for better content !!!

Q & A

Hy there to all of you out there, white, black, yellow and avatar ๐Ÿ˜‹๐Ÿคฃ people around the WordPress world !

Hope you are all well and safe in these troubled times we live on this beautiful planet of ours !

I come before you, to ask for your opinion and what you would like to see explained in my posts !?! Just let me know and I will try my best to accomodate your requests !

Thank you for your time !








Your Silence…



Silenceย is the absence of ambientย audibleย  sound, the emission of sounds of such lowย intensityย that they do not draw attention to themselves, or the state of having ceased to produce sounds; this latter sense can be extended to apply to the cessation or absence of any form ofย communication, whether throughย speechย or other medium.

Sometimes speakers fall silent when they hesitate in searching for a word, or interrupt themselves before correcting themselves.

Discourse analysisย shows that people use brief silences to mark the boundaries ofย prosodic units, inย turn-taking, or as reactive tokens, e.g., as a sign of displeasure, disagreement, embarrassment, desire to think, confusion, and the like.

Relatively prolonged intervals of silence can be used inย rituals; in some religious disciplines, people maintain silence for protracted periods, or even for the rest of their lives, as an ascetic means of spiritual transformation.

Joseph Jordaniaย has suggested that inย social animalsย (includingย humans), silence can be a sign of danger.

Many social animals produce seemingly haphazard sounds which are known asย contact calls. These are a mixture of various sounds, accompanying the group’s everyday business (for example, foraging,ย  feeding), and they are used to maintainย audioย contact with the members of the group.

Some social animal species communicate the signal of potential danger by stopping contact calls and freezing, without the use ofย alarm calls, through silence.

Charles Darwinย wrote about this in relation with wild horse and cattle.ย Jordania has further suggested that humanย hummingย  could have been a contact method that early humans used to avoid silence. According to his suggestion, humans find prolonged silence distressing (suggesting danger to them).

This may help explain why lone humans in relative sonic isolation feel a sense of comfort from humming, whistling, talking to themselves, or having the TV or radio on.

See Also:




With ๐Ÿ’š

Executive Order 6102

History Lessons,
never to be forgotten!ยก



Executive Order 6102ย is anย executive orderย signed on April 5, 1933, byย US Presidentย Franklin D. Rooseveltย “forbidding theย hoardingย ofย gold coin,ย gold bullion, andย gold certificatesย within the continental United States.”

The executive order was made under the authority of theย Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, as amended by theย Emergency Banking Actย in March 1933.

Summary

  • Forbade ownership of quantities ofย gold coin,ย bullion, andย gold certificatesย worth in excess of $100 (about 5ย troy ounces), with exemptions for specific uses and collections;
  • Required all persons to deliver excess quantities of the above on or before May 1, 1933 in exchange for $20.67 perย troy ounce;
  • Enabled Federal funding ofย Exchange Stabilization Fundย using profit realized from international transactions against new Federal reserves.

The limitation on gold ownership in the United States was repealed after Presidentย Gerald Fordย signed a bill legalizing private ownership of gold coins, bars, and certificates by an Act of Congress, codified inย Pub.L.93โ€“373,which went into effect December 31, 1974.

The stated reason for the order was that hard times had caused “hoarding” of gold, stalling economic growth and worsening theย depressionย as the US was then using theย gold standardย for its currency

On April 6, 1933,ย The New York Timesย wrote, under the headlineย Hoarding of Gold, “The Executive Order issued by the President yesterday amplifies and particularizes his earlier warnings against hoarding.

On March 6, taking advantage of aย wartime statuteย that had not been repealed, he issuedย Presidential Proclamationย 2039ย that forbade the hoarding ‘of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency’, under penalty of $10,000 and/or up to five to ten years imprisonment.”

The main rationale behind the order was actually to remove the constraint on the Federal Reserve preventing it from increasing the money supply during the depression.

Theย Federal Reserve Actย (1913) required 40% gold backing ofย Federal Reserve Notesย that were issued. By the late 1920s, theย Federal Reserveย had almost reached the limit of allowable credit, in the form of Federal Reserve demand notes, which could be backed by the gold in its possession.


Source:
https://wikipedia.com/






Secret IRS Files


ProPublica


Any more Questions ?ยฟ



Warren Buffett

Jeff Bezos

Elon Musk

End of Lesson !
Class Dismissed !
๐Ÿฅบ ๐Ÿคซ ๐Ÿ˜‰ ๐Ÿ™‚


P.S - Before any ๐Ÿง less ๐Ÿ‘pss start ๐Ÿ‘ing at any of these Wealthy "gentlemen" and their "charitable" acts for a country or the other... 

Take a deep breath...

And try to think...

If "one" that has a Wealth Growth of $13,900,000,000.00 Billions, has a Total Income Reported of $1,520,000,000.00 Billion and paid in Total Taxes 450,000,000.00 Millions, with a True Tax Rate of 3.27% sends Tech in countries that are of interest for so many reasons you would ๐Ÿคข๐Ÿคฎ๐Ÿคข ...

Who's paying for the Tech ?!?

Me... You... My Momma... Your Momma !!!

End of story !!!

Use your ๐Ÿง  folks !!!

Use your ๐Ÿง  !!!

You already have it, it's almost FREE ๐Ÿ˜‰ ๐Ÿคฃ ๐Ÿ™‚


Source:

https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax